Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Volume 21, Issue 9 , Pages 1010-1015, September 2008

Clinical Utility of Guideline-Based Echocardiography: A Prospective Study of Outpatient Referral Patterns at a Tertiary Care Center

Echocardiography Laboratory, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milano, Italy

published online 01 August 2008.

Background

The spread of echocardiography has increased the number of requests for echocardiography and the length of patient waiting lists in National Health Systems. This overuse of echocardiography may also result in a decrease in examination quality because of an excess in workload. The recommended use of guidelines for the requesting of echocardiograms could reduce the demand for this investigation and thus reduce both workload and health care costs.

Methods

In a prospective study of 520 outpatients in a large tertiary referral center, we analyzed adherence by family physicians and cardiovascular specialists to published guidelines for requesting echocardiograms; the use of a written indication justifying the request for the first and subsequent examinations; the diagnostic outcome; and the clinical utility of each echocardiogram performed.

Results

Most echocardiograms (72%) were requested by specialists, follow-ups were frequent (72%), and 14% of these proved normal. Among first examinations, 49% of those requested by family physicians and 36% of those requested by specialists were normal (P = not significant [NS]); in both groups 27% of the requests lacked a written indication. Family physicians requested echocardiograms chiefly for arterial hypertension, palpitations, chest pain, and valve disease, whereas specialists most often requested echocardiograms for checking valve prostheses, ischemic heart disease, and valve disease. The rate of adherence to guidelines (54% vs 52%, P = NS) and clinical utility (60% vs 61%, P = NS) was low and similar for family physicians and specialists. Provision of a written indication for the examination by the requesting physician correlated strongly to the clinical utility of the test (P < .001), and adherence of indication to guidelines was the major determinant of clinical utility at logistic regression analysis (P < .001).

Conclusion

The rate of adherence to guidelines was lower than desirable and similar for family physicians and cardiovascular specialists. Adherence to guidelines and provision of a written specific indication strongly enhanced the value of the echocardiographic investigation.

Keywords: Echocardiography, Clinical utility, Guidelines, Indications

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0894-7317(08)00364-7

doi:10.1016/j.echo.2008.06.006

Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Volume 21, Issue 9 , Pages 1010-1015, September 2008