Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Volume 23, Issue 3 , Pages 267-274, March 2010

Application of the Appropriateness Criteria for Echocardiography in an Academic Medical Center

  • Niti R. Aggarwal, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota
  • ,
  • Punsak Wuthiwaropas, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota
  • ,
  • Barry L. Karon, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota
  • ,
  • Fletcher A. Miller, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota
  • ,
  • Patricia A. Pellikka, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Patricia A. Pellikka, MD, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905.

published online 18 January 2010.

Background

The authors examined the feasibility of application of the American College of Cardiology Foundation's appropriateness criteria for transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) at a large tertiary care practice.

Methods

Indications for consecutive TTE and TEE were determined by chart review and classified according to the guidelines as appropriate, inappropriate, or uncertain or, for situations not addressed in the document, nonclassifiable.

Results

Of the 529 studies reviewed, 469 were appropriate, 23 inappropriate, 1 uncertain, and 36 nonclassifiable. Inappropriate and nonclassifiable studies were more commonly TTE than TEE (P < .001). Inappropriate studies were more common in outpatients than inpatients (P < .001). Nonclassifiable cases included assessment after radiofrequency ablation (33.3%) and preoperative evaluation (8.3%). Disagreement between observers in selection of the criterion was present in 30.8%.

Conclusions

Although the study was conducted retrospectively, only 4.7% of classifiable studies were inappropriate. The reproducibility of classification was moderate, and 6.8% of studies were not classifiable. Areas for improvement of the criteria were identified.

Keywords: Appropriateness, Echocardiography, Imaging, Transthoracic echocardiography, Transesophageal echocardiography

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Dr Wuthiwaropas was supported by a grant from Bangkok Christian Hospital (Bangkok, Thailand).

PII: S0894-7317(09)01043-8

doi:10.1016/j.echo.2009.11.005

Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Volume 23, Issue 3 , Pages 267-274, March 2010