Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Volume 23, Issue 3 , Pages 309-314, March 2010

Left Atrial Electromechanical Conduction Time Can Predict Six-Month Maintenance of Sinus Rhythm After Electrical Cardioversion in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation by Doppler Tissue Echocardiography

  • Seong-Mi Park, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • ,
  • Yong-Hyun Kim, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • ,
  • Jong-Il Choi, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • ,
  • Hui-Nam Pak, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • ,
  • Young-Hoon Kim, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • ,
  • Wan-Joo Shim, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Wan-Joo Shim, MD, Division of Cardiology, Korea University College of Medicine, 126-1, Anamdong-5-ga, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, Korea.

published online 08 February 2010.

Background

The purpose of this study was to determine whether atrial electromechanical conduction time (EMT) measured by echocardiography can predict 6-month maintenance of sinus rhythm (SR) after electrical cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods

Fifty-three patients with persistent AF (>1 month) who had successful cardioversion and 30 controls with SR were prospectively enrolled. SR maintenance was assessed during 6-month follow-up. EMT was measured as the time interval from the onset of the P wave on electrocardiography to the peak of the late diastolic wave from the septal and lateral mitral annulus (EMT-S and EMT-L, respectively) and the lateral tricuspid annulus (EMT-T) on tissue Doppler echocardiography.

Results

Compared with controls, left atrial (LA) volume index, P-wave duration, and EMT were significantly larger in patients with AF (all P values < .001). In patients with AF, the duration of AF (P = .71) and P-wave duration (P = .24) were not different between the SR maintenance group (n = 23) and the AF recurrence group (n = 30), and there was a trend toward increased LA volume index in the AF recurrence group (47.0 ± 12.4 vs 45.3 ± 12.6 mL/m2, P = .07). EMT-S and EMT-L were significantly larger in the AF recurrence group (131.4 ± 20.9 vs 116.3 ± 15.5 ms, P = .005, and 152.2 ± 15.7 vs 128.9 ± 13.8 ms, P < .001, respectively), but not EMT-T. EMT-S and EMT-L were related to LA volume index (r = .36, P = .008, and r = .33, P = .02, respectively). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, only EMT-L was an independent predictor of identifying patients who remained in SR (P < .001), and the sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of 6-month maintenance of restored SR were 82.6% and 83.3% using a cutoff value of EMT-L ≤ 138.0 ms (odds ratio, 0.862; 95% confidence interval, 0.788-0.942; P = .001).

Conclusion

LA EMT was significantly prolonged in patients with recurring AF, indicating significantly depressed atrial conduction in enlarged LA, and can predict 6-month maintenance of SR after electrical cardioversion.

Keywords: Electromechanical conduction time, Atrial fibrillation, Cardioversion, Tissue Doppler echocardiography

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0894-7317(09)01205-X

doi:10.1016/j.echo.2009.12.019

Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Volume 23, Issue 3 , Pages 309-314, March 2010