Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Volume 23, Issue 4 , Pages 432-438, April 2010

Recovery of Function After Acute Myocardial Infarction Evaluated by Tissue Doppler Strain and Strain Rate

  • Charlotte Bjork Ingul, PhD, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Charlotte Bjork Ingul, MD, PhD, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, N-7489 Trondheim, Norway.
  • ,
  • Siri Malm, PhD, MD

      Affiliations

    • University Hospital of Northern Norway, Harstad, Norway
  • ,
  • Erlend Refsdal, JD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
  • ,
  • Knut Hegbom, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
  • ,
  • Brage H. Amundsen, PhD, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
  • ,
  • Asbjorn Støylen, PhD, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
    • Department of Cardiology, St Olav's Hospital, Trondheim, Norway

published online 04 March 2010.

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate the changes and time course of recovery of regional myocardial function within the first week following successful primary coronary intervention in patients with first-time ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions using myocardial deformation analysis, which is more quantitative and thus more objective than the wall motion score.

Methods

Thirty-one consecutive patients admitted with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions were studied on days 1, 2, 3, and 7 using strain and strain rate tissue Doppler echocardiography.

Results

The mean peak troponin T level was 7.0 μg/L, and 15 patients had anterior and 16 had inferior infarct localization. Peak systolic strain rate and end-systolic strain increased significantly on day 2, both in segments with moderately reduced function (−0.6 to −1.0 s−1 vs −8% to −15%, P < .001) and in severely reduced function (−0.2 to −1.0 s−1 vs 1% to −12%, P < .001), but there were no further changes. Mean wall motion score in infarct related segments decreased significantly from day 1 to day 2 (2.7 to 2.4, P = .001) and from day 3 to day 7 (2.3 to 2.2, P = .001).

Conclusions

Recovery of regional function after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction occurred within 2 days and could be detected by wall motion score, strain rate, and strain. However, strain and strain rate were better discriminative parameters for the changes in function as well as being better to assess near normalization on day 2. This could have a clinical impact on early management in patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention.

Keywords: Strain rate, Strain, Strain rate imaging, Tissue Doppler, Acute myocardial infarction, Echocardiography

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Drs Ingul and Amundsen are recipients of research grants from the Norwegian Research Council, through the Center for Research-Based Innovation, MI-Lab (Trondheim, Norway).

PII: S0894-7317(10)00090-8

doi:10.1016/j.echo.2010.01.018

Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Volume 23, Issue 4 , Pages 432-438, April 2010