Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Volume 23, Issue 5 , Pages 567-572, May 2010

Automated Border Detection for Assessing the Mechanical Properties of the Carotid Arteries: Comparison with Carotid Intima–Media Thickness

University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

published online 04 March 2010.

Background

Although carotid intima–media thickness (CIMT) assesses the structural properties of the carotid artery, it does not assess the mechanical properties of the vessel.

Methods

The carotid arteries of 71 adult patients were evaluated with CIMT, and automated border detection computed vessel stiffness, compliance, elasticity, and distensibility.

Results

CIMT and mechanical properties were differentially affected by traditional cardiac risk factors, with age dominating for CIMT, and age, diabetes, and smoking dominating for mechanical variables. There was a moderate linear correlation between CIMT and the distensibility coefficient (r = −0.54), but there were weak associations with other parameters of dynamic vessel function. When patients were separated into risk groups, the mechanical vascular parameters' classification frequently differed from the CIMT classification. This was particularly notable for patients with intermediate CIMT values, who were reclassified as low or high risk by mechanical parameters 45% of the time.

Conclusion

We found that it is feasible to assess the cross-sectional area of the carotid artery using automatic border detection, which allows a novel method of determining carotid mechanical properties. These functional characteristics are often discordant with CIMT, suggesting that mechanical properties may be an important adjunct to the CIMT when evaluating the carotid artery.

Keywords: Automated border detection, Carotid arteries, Carotid intima–media thickness, Echocardiography

Abbreviations: ABD, Automated border detection, Ad, End-diastolic area, As, End-systolic area, AQ, Acoustic quanification, CIMT, Carotid intima-media thickness, CSC, Cross-sectional compliance, DC, Distensibility coefficient, Dd, End-diastolic dimension, Ds, End-systolic dimension, EM, Elastic modulus

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Funding: none

 No conflict of interest to report.

PII: S0894-7317(10)00096-9

doi:10.1016/j.echo.2010.01.024

Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Volume 23, Issue 5 , Pages 567-572, May 2010