Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Volume 23, Issue 5 , Pages 511-515, May 2010

Rapid Estimation of Left Ventricular Function Using Echocardiographic Speckle-Tracking of Mitral Annular Displacement

  • Wendy Tsang, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
  • ,
  • Homaa Ahmad, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
  • ,
  • Amit R. Patel, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
  • ,
  • Lissa Sugeng, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
  • ,
  • Ivan S. Salgo, MD, MS

      Affiliations

    • Philips Medical Systems, Andover, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Lynn Weinert, BS

      Affiliations

    • University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
  • ,
  • Victor Mor-Avi, PhD

      Affiliations

    • University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
  • ,
  • Roberto M. Lang, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Roberto M. Lang, MD, University of Chicago Medical Center, 5841 S Maryland Avenue, MC5084, Chicago, IL 60637.

published online 01 April 2010.

Background

Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) by transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiography is time-intensive and highly dependent on image quality. Mitral annular displacement (MAD) qualitatively correlates with EF and can be measured in patients with poor image quality and dropout. The authors hypothesized that speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE)–derived MAD could quantify EF accurately and tested this hypothesis using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) as a reference.

Methods

One hundred eighteen patients undergoing clinical transthoracic echocardiography were screened, and 110 whose mitral annuli was sufficiently well-defined irrespective of LV endocardial visualization underwent CMR within 6 days (85 of 110 in 1 day). Reference CMR EF values were obtained using standard methodology. STE was used to track annular motion throughout the cardiac cycle in the apical 2-chamber and 4-chamber views. To establish the relationship between MAD and CMR EF and to obtain a formula to estimate EF from MAD, regression analysis was performed in a study group of 60 patients with a wide range of EFs. This formula was then used in an independent test group of 50 patients by comparing estimated MAD EF against CMR EF values using Pearson's correlation and Bland-Altman analyses.

Results

In the study group, STE MAD correlated highly with CMR EF and resulted in a formula relating MAD to EF. In the test group, estimated EF correlated well with CMR EF (4-chamber, R2 = 0.64; 2-chamber, R2 = 0.55), with near-zero bias and acceptable limits of agreement. Intraobserver and interobserver variability were between 5.8% and 12.7%.

Conclusions

STE MAD is a clinically useful tool for quick, easy, robust, and accurate estimates of EF irrespective of LV endocardial definition.

Keywords: Ventricular function, Ejection fraction, Speckle-tracking echocardiography, Cardiac magnetic resonance

Abbreviations: CMR, Cardiac magnetic resonance, EF, Ejection fraction, LV, Left ventricular, MAD, Mitral annular displacement, STE, Speckle-tracking echocardiography, TTE, Transthoracic echocardiography

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0894-7317(10)00187-2

doi:10.1016/j.echo.2010.03.003

Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Volume 23, Issue 5 , Pages 511-515, May 2010