Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Volume 23, Issue 6 , Pages 621-627, June 2010

Echocardiographic Effects of Changing Atrioventricular Delay in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Based on Displacement

  • Nana Valeur, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Gentofte University Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Nana Valeur, MD, PhD, Gentofte University Hospital, Department of Cardiology, 2820 Gentofte, Denmark.
  • ,
  • Thomas Fritz-Hansen, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Gentofte University Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark
  • ,
  • Niels Risum, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Gentofte University Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark
  • ,
  • Rasmus Mogelvang, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Holbaek University Hospital, Holbaek, Denmark
  • ,
  • Poul Erik Bloch Thomsen, MD, DMSci

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Gentofte University Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark
  • ,
  • Peter Søgaard, MD, DMSci

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Gentofte University Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark

Background

In studies showing benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), individual atrioventricular (AV) delays have been optimized using echocardiography. However, the method for AV delay optimization remains controversial.

Methods

In 100 consecutive patients with CRT device implantation, AV delay was optimized using echocardiography. The optimal AV delay was determined by changing the interval in 20-ms increments while measuring displacement in 6 basal left ventricular segments (averaged and reported as left ventricular displacement [DLV]) and other echocardiographic measures.

Results

A single optimal AV delay existed for each patient, and the associated highest DLV corresponded with the maximal velocity-time integral (VTI) in the left ventricular outflow tract (VTILVOT) and the E/e′ ratio. Significant increases in DLV and the VTILVOT from before to after implantation with standard settings and from standard to optimal AV delay by displacement were found. Diastolic filling time corresponded poorly with DLV and the VTILVOT.

Conclusion

Individual optimal AV delay programming provides significant improvement in left ventricular performance and hemodynamics. Displacement analysis and the VTILVOT are interchangeable, whereas diastolic filling time cannot be recommended.

Keywords: AV delay, CRT optimization, Echocardiographic displacement

Abbreviations: AV, Atrioventricular, CRT, Cardiac resynchronization therapy, DFT, Diastolic filling time, DLV, Left ventricular displacement, DRV, Right ventricular displacement, LV, Left ventricular, LVEF, Left ventricular ejection fraction, RV, Right ventricular, VTI, Velocity-time integral, VTILVOT, Velocity-time integral in the left ventricular outflow tract

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0894-7317(10)00324-X

doi:10.1016/j.echo.2010.04.006

Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Volume 23, Issue 6 , Pages 621-627, June 2010