Volume 23, Issue 11 , Pages 1199-1204, November 2010
Evaluation of the Clinical Application of the ACCF/ASE Appropriateness Criteria for Stress Echocardiography
Background
The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical application of the American College of Cardiology Foundation and American Society of Echocardiography appropriateness criteria for stress echocardiography (SE) in a single-center university hospital.
Methods
Indications were determined for consecutive studies by two reviewers and categorized as appropriate, uncertain, or inappropriate.
Results
Of 477 studies for which primary indications could be determined, 188 specifically related to university transplantation programs were excluded. Of the remaining 289 studies, 88% were addressed in the appropriateness criteria for SE. Of these, 71% were appropriate, 9% were uncertain, and 20% were inappropriate. Inappropriate studies were more likely to be ordered on younger patients and women and were less likely to be ordered by cardiologists. Abnormal results on SE were more frequent among appropriate than inappropriate studies.
Conclusions
The appropriateness criteria for SE encompass and effectively characterize the majority of studies ordered in a single-center university hospital and appear to reasonably stratify the likelihood of abnormal results on SE. However, revisions will be required to fully capture and stratify appropriate clinical practice of SE.
Keywords: Appropriateness criteria, Stress echocardiography, Clinical application
Abbreviations: AC, Appropriateness criteria, ACCF, American College of Cardiology Foundation, ASE, American Society of Echocardiography, CAD, Coronary artery disease, ECG, Electrocardiogram, NA, Not addressed, SE, Stress echocardiography
To access this article, please choose from the options below
This study was sponsored by a grant from the American Society of Echocardiography (Morrisville, NC).
PII: S0894-7317(10)00601-2
doi:10.1016/j.echo.2010.07.008
© 2010 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 23, Issue 11 , Pages 1199-1204, November 2010
