Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Volume 25, Issue 2 , Pages 142-152, February 2012

Limitations of Current Echocardiographic Nomograms for Left Ventricular, Valvular, and Arterial Dimensions in Children: A Critical Review

  • Massimiliano Cantinotti, MD

      Affiliations

    • Fondazione Toscana G. Monasterio, Massa and Pisa, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Massimiliano Cantinotti, MD, Fondazione G. Monasterio, Ospedale del Cuore, via Aurelia Sud, 54100 Massa, Italy.
  • ,
  • Marco Scalese, MD

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa, Italy
  • ,
  • Sabrina Molinaro, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa, Italy
  • ,
  • Bruno Murzi, MD

      Affiliations

    • Fondazione Toscana G. Monasterio, Massa and Pisa, Italy
  • ,
  • Claudio Passino, MD

      Affiliations

    • Fondazione Toscana G. Monasterio, Massa and Pisa, Italy
    • Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy

published online 21 November 2011.

An echocardiographic quantitative evaluation of the cardiac and vascular structures is often of critical importance for the diagnosis and management of congenital heart diseases. The authors reviewed the accuracy and limits of published echocardiographic nomograms for cardiac chamber, valve, and main vessel dimensions in children, with special attention to the neonatal age group. A computerized literature search in the National Library of Medicine using the keywords “echocardiographic normal/references values ± children/neonates/newborns” was performed. The research was redefined adding separately the keywords “aortic valve/annulus,” “aortic arch,” “atrio-ventricular valve/annulus,” “left ventricle,” “mitral valve/annulus,” “pulmonary valve/annulus,” “pulmonary artery,” and “tricuspid valve/annulus.” The analysis highlights the accuracy of the latest studies but also underscores that some limitations remain. In many studies, the number of healthy subjects was limited, with poor differentiation among age subgroups, and neonates were fully investigated in a very limited number of studies; moreover, data for many cardiac structures were not numerous, especially for the aortic arch and pulmonary branches. Finally, several methodologic limitations were encountered, including the lack of standardization, the different types of body size measurements used for normalization, and the various ways to express normalized data. As a result, nomograms were heterogeneous and although for some cardiac structures provided comparable confidence intervals, for others showed widely different values. The lack of solid, standardized nomograms, based on a large set of healthy children, may affect accuracy in estimating the severity of defects, especially in neonates, and possibly introduce bias in the clinical decision-making process.

Keywords: Echocardiography, References values, Congenital heart disease, Children, Neonates

Abbreviations: BSA, Body surface area, CHD, Congenital heart disease, LV, Left ventricular, MSE, Mean square error, 3D, Three-dimensional, 2D, Two-dimensional

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0894-7317(11)00790-5

doi:10.1016/j.echo.2011.10.016

Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Volume 25, Issue 2 , Pages 142-152, February 2012