Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Volume 9, Issue 2 , Pages 119-128, March 1996

Two-dimensional echocardiographic calculation of left ventricular mass as recommended by the American Society of Echocardiography: Correlation with autopsy and M-mode echocardiography

  • Seong H. Park, MD

      Affiliations

    • From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
    • the Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
    • Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
  • ,
  • Clarence Shub, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Clarence Shub, MD, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905.
    • From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
    • the Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
    • Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
  • ,
  • Thomas P. Nobrega, MD

      Affiliations

    • From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
    • the Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
    • Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
  • ,
  • Kent R. Bailey, PhD

      Affiliations

    • From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
    • the Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
    • Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
  • ,
  • James B. Seward, MD

      Affiliations

    • From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
    • the Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
    • Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

Abstract 

The American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) has recommended diastolic area length and truncated ellipsoid methods for estimating left ventricular (LV) mass by two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography. The major goals of this retrospective study were to (1) assess the correlation between ASE-recommended 2D and M-mode echo-derived measurements of LV mass, (2) compare the two ASE-recommended 2D echocardiography methods, and (3) compare the echo-derived LV mass with anatomic LV mass. The study included 2D echocardiograms obtained within 30 days of death from 34 patients who subsequently underwent autopsy and 2D echocardiograms of 56 normal subjects. The formula used for measurement of M-mode echoderived LV mass was LV mass = 0.8 (ASE-cube LV mass) + 0.6 gm. For 2D echo-derived LV mass, the ASE-recommended area length and truncated ellipsoid methods in systole and diastole were used, with and without incorporating the papillary muscles into the myocardial shell. LV mass derived by M-mode echocardiography was comparable to that derived by 2D methods, and it is reasonable to use this technique for normally shaped ventricles. When the papillary muscles were included into the myocardial shell, diastolic 2D methods overestimated autopsy LV mass. Both diastolic area length and truncated ellipsoid methods were comparable to autopsy LV mass. When the papillary muscles were excluded, the systolic area length method showed the best agreement with autopsy LV mass.

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0894-7317(96)90019-X

Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Volume 9, Issue 2 , Pages 119-128, March 1996